Legal Opinion
Alday v. Office of Personnel Management
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-0194Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TY ALDAY, Plaintiff Vv. Civil Case No. 20-194 (RJL) OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION September Bf, 2021 [Dkt. ## 9, 13] Plaintiff, Ty Alday (“plaintiff or “Alday”), is challenging the United States Office of Personnel Management’s (“OPM”) retroactive termination of his federal health benefits. Specifically, Alday contends that the agency’s months-long delay in notifying him of his benefits termination violated the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process. Alday has…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.