Legal Opinion

Lonesome Dove Petroleum, Inc. v. Nelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2000No. 990272PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Charles Schreiner 'Nelson appeals from a judgment finding Nelson and Lonesome Dove Petroleum, Inc. (“Lonesome Dove”) had entered into a valid contract for redemption of Nelson’s shares in the company and finding no breath of a fiduciary duty owed to Nelson. Concluding the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Lonesome Dove was formed in 1993. Nelson and Michael Flinn each provided approximately half of the original $80,000 capital contribution, and each received one-third of the stock. The remaining one-third was held by Susanne…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Mazzella v. KokenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Stonewood Hotel Corp. v. Davis Development, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brandt v. SomervilleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Center Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kortum v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. B.J. Kadrmas, Inc. v. Oxbow Energy, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API