Lonesome Dove Petroleum, Inc. v. Nelson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Charles Schreiner 'Nelson appeals from a judgment finding Nelson and Lonesome Dove Petroleum, Inc. (“Lonesome Dove”) had entered into a valid contract for redemption of Nelson’s shares in the company and finding no breath of a fiduciary duty owed to Nelson. Concluding the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Lonesome Dove was formed in 1993. Nelson and Michael Flinn each provided approximately half of the original $80,000 capital contribution, and each received one-third of the stock. The remaining one-third was held by Susanne…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Mazzella v. KokenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Stonewood Hotel Corp. v. Davis Development, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Brandt v. SomervilleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Center Mutual Insurance Co. v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Kortum v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- B.J. Kadrmas, Inc. v. Oxbow Energy, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.