McCarthy v. Tobin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
We granted the interveners’ application for further appellate review following the Appeals Court’s opinion in McCarthy v. Tobin, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 274, 279 (1998), concluding *85that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of a real estate purchase. The plaintiff, John J. McCarthy, Jr., claims that the defendant, Ann G. Tobin, agreed to sell certain real estate to him. He asserts that they created a binding agreement when they signed a standard offer to purchase (OTP) form. The DiMinicos intervened because they later agreed to purchase the property in question from Tobin. McCarthy and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Greenfield Country Estates Tenants Ass'n v. DeepMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Goren v. Royal Investments Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. Malouf, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Targus Group International, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- TLT Construction Corp. v. RI, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. Norwood Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.