B.J. Kadrmas, Inc. v. Oxbow Energy, LLC
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Oxbow Energy, LLC, appeals from a district court judgment ordering it to pay for services under an implied contract with B.J. Kadrmas, Inc. Concluding that the facts and surrounding circumstances, as well as the district court’s resolution of conflicting testimony, support the conclusion that the parties mutually intended to form a binding legal obligation, we affirm.
I
[If 2] At trial, Robert Angerer of Oil For America (“OFA”) testified that he met with Bev Kadrmas in December 2003 to discuss having her company perform title searches on lands whose mineral rights had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- National Bank of Harvey v. International Harvester Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Amann v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Akerlind v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- A.G. Golden v. SM Energy CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Coughlin Construction Co. v. Nu-Tec Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Good Bird v. Twin Buttes School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.