A.G. Golden v. SM Energy Company
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] SM Energy Company appealed from a summary judgment declaring that A.G. Golden and other plaintiffs are entitled to a four percent overriding royalty interest in leases and lands covered by a 1970 letter agreement and ordering SM to pay amounts due to Golden and the other plaintiffs for these interests, and from an order denying SM’s motion to amend or for relief from the judgment. We conclude the district court erred in ruling as a matter of law that SM, through its predecessors in interest, expressly assumed an “area of mutual interest” clause in the 1970…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gavenda v. Strata Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Orion Tire Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Shark v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Woodland v. WoodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Spring Creek Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Hess Bakken Inv., II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Markgraf v. WelkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- THR Minerals, LLC. v. RobinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Hallin v. Inland Oil & Gas CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.