Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Somerville

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2005No. 20040112PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Brandt, John Brandt, and Roy Brandt appealed and Dean Somer-ville, Margaret Somerville, and Posilock Puller, Inc., cross-appealed from a judgment and post-judgment order in Brandts’ shareholder action against Somervilles seeking damages for breaches of fiduciary duties and seeking an order requiring Somervilles to buy Brandts’ shares of Posi-lock for fair market value. We hold the trial court’s findings of fact about the Brandts’ claims for breaches of fiduciary duties are not clearly erroneous, the court did not err in applying the book value provision of a stock…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hogan v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Schumacher v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Balvik v. SylvesterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sorlie v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nelson v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Estate of ElkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Roemmich v. Eagle Eye Development, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API