United States v. Piedad Barajas-Avalos, AKA Piedad Barajas-Avaslos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge ALARCÓN; Partial Dissent by Judge FERGUSON.
*1043ORDER
The court’s opinion, filed March 10, 2004 [359 F.3d 1204], is amended as follows:
The final sentence of the second full paragraph on slip op. 2878 [359 F.3d at 1213] that reads, “In the instant matter, the officers did not enter the trailer or use a device to explore its interior,” is deleted.
The two paragraphs on slip op. 2879-80 [359 F.3d at 1213-14] that read:
We agree with Mr. Barajas-Avalos that “there is no Fourth Amendment rule that provides for protection only for traditionally constructed houses.” Appellant’s Opening…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Labrada-BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. DessesaureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Salvador Martinez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.