Legal Opinion

United States v. Piedad Barajas-Avalos, AKA Piedad Barajas-Avaslos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2004No. 02-30301PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge ALARCÓN; Partial Dissent by Judge FERGUSON.

*1043ORDER

The court’s opinion, filed March 10, 2004 [359 F.3d 1204], is amended as follows:

The final sentence of the second full paragraph on slip op. 2878 [359 F.3d at 1213] that reads, “In the instant matter, the officers did not enter the trailer or use a device to explore its interior,” is deleted.

The two paragraphs on slip op. 2879-80 [359 F.3d at 1213-14] that read:

We agree with Mr. Barajas-Avalos that “there is no Fourth Amendment rule that provides for protection only for traditionally constructed houses.” Appellant’s Opening…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Labrada-BustamanteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. United States v. DessesaureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Salvador Martinez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API