Legal Opinion
United States v. Labrada-Bustamante
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 10, 2005No. 04-30082, 04-30159, 04-30189, 04-30175PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Armando Labrada-Busta-mante (Labrada), Roberto Duarte-Cruz (Duarte), and Catalino Baranda-Gallardo (Baranda) were convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, methamphetamine (meth), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. After determining that the quantity of meth involved in the proposed sale was five pounds, the court sentenced both Labrada and Duarte to 151-month terms of imprisonment. Baranda was sentenced to a term of 87 months. The defendants appealed, and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Richard I. Berger, United States of America v. Richard I. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jeffrey H. FeingoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Anatoli ZakharovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.