Flying J, Inc. v. Van Hollen
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Flying J, Inc., brought a facial challenge to Wisconsin’s gasoline pricing regulations. The district court granted Flying J’s motion for summary judgment and permanent injunction against enforcing the provisions, finding that the provisions were preempted by the Sherman Act and not saved by state action immunity. We granted the Wisconsin Petroleum Marketers & Convenience Store Association’s motion to intervene after the original Defendants — the state officials charged with enforcing the provisions — declined to appeal the district court’s decision. Because we find that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alarm Detection Systems, Incor v. Orland Fire Protection DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Conn Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. SeagullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Connecticut Fine Wine & Spirits, LLC v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Connecticut Fine Wine and Spirits LLC v. SeagullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Alarm Detection Systems, Incor v. Orland Fire Protection DistriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.