Legal Opinion
Alarm Detection Systems, Incor v. Orland Fire Protection Distri
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 15, 2019No. 18-2926PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
St. Eve, Circuit Judge.
*867 This appeal is one of two we decide today regarding the market for commercial fire-alarm services in Chicago's suburbs. Here we are concerned with the Villages of Orland Park and Orland Hills (the "Villages") and, to a lesser extent, Bloomingdale and Lemont.
In 2014, citing safety concerns, the Villages passed ordinances that require commercial buildings to send fire-alarm signals directly to the local 911 dispatch center. This decision, sensible as it may seem, comes at an economic cost: either by design or due to technological restraints, the ordinances allow only one…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alarm Detection Sys., Inc. v. Vill. of Schaumburg, Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Aland v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. v. Village of SchaumburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. v. Village of SchaumburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. v. Village of SchaumburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.