Legal Opinion
People v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1968No. Civ. No 30971PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AISO, J. pro tem. *
Stuyvesant Insurance Company (hereinafter, "Stuyvesant”) appeals from an order denying its motion to set aside an order declaring forfeiture of the bail which it had posted on behalf of defendant Louis Stern in the principal criminal action. Raised for the first time, insofar as we are aware, is the question whether a trial court under the guise of taking a motion to vacate a bail forfeiture “under submission” can prolong the jurisdictional period in which the bail must make a showing for relief.
Factual and Procedural Background Defendant Louis Stern was charged with sundry…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- California Cigarette Concessions, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. North Beach Bonding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Adams v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Jordan v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.