Legal Opinion
People v. Ranger Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1994No. Docket Nos. B065563, B066363PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
Introduction
These consolidated appeals contest rulings made by the trial court at a hearing to vacate two bail forfeitures. We first reject the contention made by the two sureties (National and Ranger) that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to order the bail forfeitures in the first instance. We affirm the trial court’s ruling denying National’s motion to vacate its forfeiture, finding that the policy provision relied upon by National does not establish that the issued bond was void. Because we agree with the district attorney that the trial court erred in holding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- McDermott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. American Contractors Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. Frontier Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. KoreckySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.