Legal Opinion
Jordan v. City of Sacramento
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 2007No. C052159PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
After tripping and falling on a public sidewalk, plaintiff Greta Jordan filed a claim for tort damages with defendant City of Sacramento (City) in October 2003. In January 2004, the City notified her that it had rejected her claim by operation of law. In August 2004, she filed the present action against the abutting property owner, the Capitol Area Redevelopment Authority (CADA). In April 2005, she filed an amended pleading with leave of court adding the City as defendant.
Defendant City successfully moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff 'did not…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Vu v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Silva v. See's Candy Shops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- May v. City of MilpitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.