Legal Opinion
Batista v. Chater
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1997No. 96 Civ. 3885 (SS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Manuel Batista brings this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), to challenge a final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) based on disability. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons to be discussed, both motions for judgment on the pleadings are DENIED. Plaintiffs action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Edwind F. PRATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Walter E. Parker v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Melendez v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Grubb v. ChaterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Richardson v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Emerick v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020