Legal Opinion
Grubb v. Chater
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1998No. 96 Civ. 3297 (HB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BAER, District Judge. 1
Plaintiff Charisse Grubb brought this action under Sections 205(g) and 1631(c)(3) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), to challenge the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”). Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 12(e)”) for an order affirming the decision of the Commissioner and dismissing the complaint. For the reasons stated below, this Court finds that the Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flanigan v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Casiano v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Echevarria v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- AGUDO-MARTINEZ v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Rivera v. KijakaziDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.