Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1999No. 97 Civ. 4673(RLC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Barbara Richardson (“Richardson”) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) challeng ing the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) that she is not entitled to Supplemental Security Income disability benefits (“SSI”). Both parties move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), F.R. Civ. P.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural history
Richardson applied for SSI on November 3, 1993, alleging that she was disabled since August, 1988, due to a tumor, kidney pain, depression, and a possible…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Edwind F. PRATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodford v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Gonzalez v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- McIntire v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Patterson v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Miller v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013