Legal Opinion

Richwine v. Jones

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1895No. 17,060PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— This was an action brought by appellee to reform deeds and to quiet title to real estate.

Appellants were at first defaulted and judgment was rendered for appellee as prayed for.

Afterwards the default was set aside, and the appellants answered. There was a change of venue from the regular judge, and the cause was submitted to a special judge who made a finding and entered judgment, as before, for appellee.

After the overruling of a motion for a new trial for cause, and the granting of an appeal to this court, a motion was made for a new trial as of right.

A new trial as of right having been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagoner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Marshall v. State ex rel. ShryerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Silver Creek Cement Corp. v. Union Lime & Cement Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fahlor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howe v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Board of Commissioners v. TreesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Garrard v. Silver Peak MinesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  4. Barber v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Ayers v. HuddlestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API