Board of Commissioners v. Trees
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Shelby Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Reinhard, J. —
The only specification of error is the overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial. It is earnestly contended by appellee’s counsel that the bill of exceptions is not properly in the record, there being no sufficient certificate of the clerk. It is true that in the clerk’s certificate to the transcript there is no recital of the filing of the bill of exceptions. But the transcript does contain a record entry just preceding the bill of exceptions, which shows “that on the *48024th day of August, 1894, in vacation of the Shelby Circuit Court, and within the time limited…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Furry v. O'ConnorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Richwine v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Board of Commissioners v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Board of Commissioners v. Motherwell Iron & Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McKEE v. HASLERIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Lake Station v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hire v. PinkertonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
- Palumbo v. Harry M. Quinn, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Stewart v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.