Ayers v. Huddleston
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Fayette Circuit Court; F. S. Swift, Judge. Action by Silas Ayers against Hannah Huddleston and others for the location of a boundary line. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff' appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The controversy in this case is -as to the location of the line dividing the lands of appellant from those of the appellees. Appellant’s complaint is in three paragraphs, — ejectment, to establish a boundary line, and to quiet title. Appellees had judgment. Error is assigned on the refusal of a new trial.
In April, 1851, Basil McCann conveyed to J. Holton & Co. the following: “All that lot of ground being in the northwest quarter of section number thirty, town number fourteen, range number thirteen east, lying east of the Whitewater river, commencing at the mouth of the Whitewater river…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Newsom v. Pryor's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Johnson v. ArchibaldTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Riley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Overton's heirs v. DavissonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1844
- McIver Lessee v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gary Land Co. v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Wilson v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Boyd v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917