Legal Opinion

Barber v. Barber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1896No. 17,811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver upon application of appellees, who were the plaintiffs in the court belów.

The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in appointing a receiver.

It is urged by appellees that the bill of exceptions, containing the evidence given at the hearing of the application for the appointment of a receiver, is not in the record, and cannot be considered in determining the question presented. The order appointing a receiver was made December 3, 1895, in term time, and on December 6th, in open court, during the same term of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. SpaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Parmlee v. SloanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Sullivan Electric Light & Power Co. v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Richwine v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Marcilliat v. MarcilliatIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Bullerdick v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Reece v. LeitchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Dressel v. LobsteinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API