Legal Opinion

Fahlor v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1886No. 13,087PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the appellant was indicted, tried and convicted, in the court below, for unlawfully permitting a minor to play a game of pool on a pool-table, owned by such appellant. From the judgment of conviction, he has appealed to this court, and the only error, of which he here complains, is the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

*388Filed Dec. 8, 1886.

In this motion, the only causes assigned for such new trial were,.(l) that the verdict of the jury was contrary to law, (2) that it was contrary to the evidence, and (3) that it was not sustained by the evidence.

Manifestly, no question is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Galvin v. State ex rel. CrouchIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Woollen v. WishmierIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Lowery v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pedigo v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Patterson v. ChurchmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Morningstar v. MusserIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Richwine v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Doyal v. LandesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API