Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Herron

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1969No. 69-19PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

The majority of the court has resolved both questions involved against the appellant. Consequently, the affirmance of the judgment below could rest *64upon either. Since jurisdiction was assumed to consider both, as questions of great general interest, the disposition of each will be discussed.

First, is the owner of a motor vehicle who is riding in the vehicle while it is being driven by another on a purely social outing barred by the guest statute from recovery on a claim based on the simple negligence of the driver? The parties agree that, although Nancy was not the registered owner of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Lorch v. EglinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Murray v. LangSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Primes v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lusby v. LusbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Bozman v. BozmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Chila v. OwensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. Klein v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API