Legal Opinion

Murray v. Lang

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1960No. 50078PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

Action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s decedent who was killed as the result of a collision between the car in which he was riding, and being driven by defendant Harger, and a car being driven by defendant Lang.

The petition is in three counts. Count I, against defendant Lang, is based upon negligence and states that plaintiff’s decedent was a passenger in the Harger car, but not a guest under section 321.494, Code, 1958. Count II is against defendant Harger, based upon negligence, and alleges that decedent was a passenger in the Harger car but not a guest under the statute. Count III…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Keasling Ex Rel. Keasling v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Summers v. SummersIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Walton v. TullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  4. Brown v. GuiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Hardwick v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API