Lusby v. Lusby
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here hold that under the facts and circumstances of this case, amounting to an outrageous, intentional tort, a wife may sue her husband for damages — a holding which represents somewhat of a departure from the earlier decisions of this Court.
Appellant, Diana R. Lusby (the wife), brought an action in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County against John Doe, Richard Roe, and Gerald Lee Lusby (the husband). She alleged that while she was operating her motor vehicle on a public highway the husband “pulled alongside of [her] in his pick-up truck and pointed a highpowered rifle at…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Klein v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.