Legal Opinion

Roudebush v. Colonial Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 7, 1926No. 17170PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This action was brought by the Colonial Supply Company against G. B. Roudebush and W. J. Kiser, to recover the sum of $743.S5 for one Hazard drilling line.

Defendants filed their answer and cross-petition, admitting the purchase of the 4,500-foot line; that the plaintiff guaranteed the line would do the work for which it was manufactured, but the line broke after seven days’ use, and the defendants lost ■ their drilling tools in the hole, and that the Tine broke repeatedly while they were “fishing” for the tools; that after the tools were recovered, they again lost the tools…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Denison v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Turben v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Deskins v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Frey v. FailesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Dobbins v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Russell v. Lennox Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API