Legal Opinion
Turben v. Douglass
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 13, 1919No. 10164PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Error from District Court, Cotton County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by C. E. Douglass against I. E. Tur-ben, John C. Keys, and H. L. Thompson. Judgment for plaintiff against defendants Turben and Keys, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.
On March 24, 1916, Chas. E. Douglass, as plaintiff, filed his petition in the district court of Cotton county against I. E. Turben, John C. Keys, and H. L. Thompson, defendants, the principal allegations therein being as follows:
“That in 1915 plaintiff and defendant I. E. Turben entered into an agreement to promote an oil and gas prospect in Cotton county, Okla., each to share equally in the enterprise, that in pursuance of said agreement leases were to be obtained in said county which leases were to be the joint property of this plaintiff and the defendant I. E. Turben; that all the leases…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Wesley v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- City of Enid v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Taggart v. SnipesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Nadel v. ZeligsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.