Legal Opinion
Russell v. Lennox Furnace Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 1928No. 18219PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
The Lennox Furnace Company sued H. H. Hyer and J. S. Russell, individually and as copartners, under their trade name of Blockie Furnace & Supply Company, to recover on an account of $3,-072.18 for merchandise sold by plaintiff to defendants under the terms of a written agreement, a copy of which and a verified statement of the account by exhibits being-made a part of the petition.
Plaintiff was a manufacturer of certain articles of merchandise, and defendants were jobbers thereof with outlined trade territory fixed in the contract. The period of the contract was for five years with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Denison v. PhippsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Oklahoma State Bank of OcheLata v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Security Nat. Bank v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Dobbins v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- In Re Graham's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Markle v. StekollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Geren v. StorieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.