Legal Opinion

Aermotor Co. v. Earl

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1897No. 2,267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the LaPorte Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Comstock, J. —

The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first is upon the common count for goods, wares, and merchandise sold by plaintiff (appellant) to the defendant (appellee). The second is for goods, wares, and merchandise sold by appellant to appellee under a written agreement, made a part of the complaint as an exhibit. To the complaint appellee filed an answer in two paragraphs. The first is á general denial. The second, appellee styles an answer and counterclaim. Appellant, in its demurrer, refers to this pleading as a cross-complaint and an answer, and demurs thereto upon the ground…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Johnston Harvester Co. v. BartleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. McClamrock v. FlintIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. SeichtingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osborne & Co. v. HanlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Adler v. RosenOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API