Legal Opinion
Alderson v. County of Santa Clara
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 1, 1954No. Civ. 15799PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Two actions against the defendant county of Santa Clara were consolidated for trial. One action is by the minors Gerald and Jack Alderson through their guardian ad litem Phyllis Alderson, their mother, for injuries received by them, and by Phyllis Alderson for hospital fees, etc., paid by her for their care and treatment. The other action is by Dorothy Alderson against the county for her injuries. A jury trial was commenced but at the end of plaintiffs’ cases, defendant was granted nonsuits in both cases. From the judgments after denial of motions for new trial thereon, all plaintiffs appeal.
Q…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Thompson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kelleher v. Ephrata School District No. 165Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Gallipo v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- White v. Moreno Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Alwood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.