Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1984No. A024759PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J.

By this petition for writ of mandate and prohibition, the State of California (the State) seeks to compel respondent superior court to set aside its denial of petitioner’s demurrer, motion for partial summary judgment, motion to strike, and its order granting sanctions against petitioner.

On January 5, 1982, an artificially constructed landfill embankment supporting Highway 101 above Sausalito gave way and earth and debris slid down in the area known as Hurricane Gulch. The real parties in interest are five property owners whose homes were not hit by the mudslide, but who claim…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Santee v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Dilts v. Cantua Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API