Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Norkin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 31, 2013No. SC11-1356PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Jeffrey Alan Norkin be found guilty of professional misconduct. The referee recommended a sanction of a ninety-day suspension, followed by an eighteen-month period of probation. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee’s findings of fact and recommendations of guilt. We disapprove the referee’s recommended sanction of a ninety-day suspension and, instead, impose a two-year suspension. Further, Respondent shall re*79ceive a public reprimand that will be administered before the Court.

BACKGROUND

On…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. The Florida Bar v. FredericksSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Kelsay Dayon PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. & SC13-2480 The Florida Bar v. Jeffrey Alan NorkinSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  3. I Creatives, Inc. v. Premier Printing Solutions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. & SC14-1056 The Florida Bar v. Robert D. Adams and The Florida Bar v. Adam Robert FilthautSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  5. The Florida Bar v. Robert Joseph RatinerSupreme Court of Florida · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API