Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Frederick
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 4, 2000No. SC90007, SC90387PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
756 So.2d 79 (2000)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Mark Evan FREDERICK, Respondent.
Nos. SC90007, SC90387.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 2000.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, and Olivia Paiva Klein, Bar Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida, for Complainant.
W.H.F. Wiltshire, Pensacola, Florida, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Mark Evan Frederick petitions this Court to review a referee's report recommending that he be found guilty of violating several of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar and suspended from the practice of law for ninety-one days. We have jurisdiction.…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Palmer v. RS Evans, Jacksonville, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955
- The Florida Bar v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. FredericksSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Knabb v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Schwartz v. ZaconickSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by63 opinions
- Solymar Investments, Ltd. v. Banco Santander S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- LSQ Funding Group, L.C. v. EDS Field ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- King v. BrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.