& SC14-1056 The Florida Bar v. Robert D. Adams and The Florida Bar v. Adam Robert Filthaut
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a referee’s report recommending - that Robert D. Adams and Adam' Robert Filth'aut -be found guilty of professional misconduct and permanently disbarred. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. As more fully explained below,, we approve the referee’s factual findings, recommendations as to guilt, and recommendations as to discipline in their entirety. 1
FACTS
The Respondents in these two cases, Adam Robert Filthaut and Robert D. Adams, were members of a law firm, Adams & Diaco, P.A., in Tampa, Florida.' Stephen Christopher Diaco was also a member of this firm and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Coquina Investments v. TD Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schneiter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022