Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Fredericks

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 25, 1999No. 91,472PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

731 So.2d 1249 (1999)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

William B. FREDERICKS, Jr., Respondent.

No. 91,472.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 25, 1999.

Rehearing Denied May 11, 1999.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida, and Jan K. Wichrowski, Bar Counsel, Orlando, Florida, for Complainant.

Robert H. Gray, Bartow, Florida, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar and the referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by William B. Fredericks, Jr. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. The Florida Bar v. RaymanSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  4. The Florida Bar v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. The Florida Bar v. NowackiSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by41 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. The Florida Bar v. RapoportSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. The Florida Bar v. CommitteSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. KoronesSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. The Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API