Bifulk v. Evans
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants sued to recover contribution for ten installment payments (between 1978 and 1980) on a commercial note. Respondents and appellant Edward J. Bifulk were co-makers of the note. The trial court granted summary judgment against appellants, holding that their claim was the same cause of action as one they pursued earlier when recovering contribution for two 1981 installment payments on the same note, and that the earlier recovery absolutely bars the present claim under principles of res judicata.
Appellants appeal from the decision granting respondents’ summary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- McMenomy v. RydenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Shimp Ex Rel. Shimp v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myers Through Myers v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Dollar Travel Agency, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Gulbranson v. GulbransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987