Margo-Kraft Distributors, Inc. v. Minneapolis Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The sole issue on this appeal from summary judgment for defendants is whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars plaintiff’s negligence action against defendants. The issue, more specifically, is whether or not plaintiff was either a party or privy to the prior action on which defendants based their defensive claim of collateral estoppel. The trial court, after a full evidentiary hearing, ruled that defendants should have judgment on either ground.
The present lawsuit, as well as the prior lawsuit, arose out of a fire on October 12, 1960, that destroyed a building which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- McMenomy v. RydenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lustik v. RankilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lavera Granetha Ashanti v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- State v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Schumann v. McGinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Rucker v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Johnson v. HunterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.