Legal Opinion
Myers Through Myers v. Price
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 1990No. C1-90-1434PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
This tort action arises from an investigation conducted by Scott County officials in 1983 and 1984. On appeal from a grant of summary judgment against claims of malpractice and intentional infliction of emotional distress, two children of Greg and Jane Myers argue (1) respondents are not immune from liability because of a court appointment; and (2) dismissal of the Myers’ federal case does not bar litigation of their state law claims. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Beginning in September of 1983, several children in Scott County alleged they had been sexually abused by a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greg Myers, Etc. v. R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Winkler v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Goldberger v. Kaplan, Strangis & Kaplan, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re the Welfare of S.N.R.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Reed v. University of North DakotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.