Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Pomeroy

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1901No. L.A. No. 831PublishedCited by 13 opinions

MOTION to stay proceedings pending an appeal from a final order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County condemning land. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

—The plaintiff brought this action to condemn the lands described in the complaint for the purpose of constructing head-works for its domestic water-supply. Such proceedings were had that a judgment of condemnation was made and entered in April, 1896, in favor of plaintiff, and awarding defendants the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars as damages for the land. Upon appeal this judgment was affirmed by this court. (Los Angeles v. Pomeroy, 124 Cal. 597.) Upon the remittitur being sent to the court below, plaintiff made a motion for a final order of condemnation, alleging that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. California Southern Railroad v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. City of Alameda v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. County of San Luis Obispo v. SimasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. McLean v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Coburn v. HynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API