Coburn v. Hynes
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of supersedeas directed to M. J. Hynes, as guardian of the person and estate of an incompetent person. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner was duly declared by the superior court to be an incompetent person, and M. J. Hynes was appointed and qualified as guardian of his person and estate. Immediately following the order of appointment in the guardianship proceeding Loren Coburn, petitioner herein, gave notice of an appeal and within the time required by law filed in proper form his undertaking on appeal in the sum of three hundred dollars. He now petitions for a writ of supersedeas, alleging that the said M. J. Hynes threatens to take possession of his property and to act as his guardian in spite of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Born v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Estate of SchedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Gottwals v. RencherNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- O'Donnell v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Swain v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.