City of Alameda v. Cohen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff, condemning certain lands in the city of Alameda for a 23ublic street and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The main contention of appeallant is, that the act of March 6, 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 70), is unconstitutional. The act has heretofore been before -this court, and held to he valid (Davies v. Los Angeles, 86 Cal. 37); and again in a case, in which this a23pellant was plaintiff, involving the validity of the assessment for the .purpose of paying for the right of way and improvement involved in this suit. (Cohen…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- City of Santa Cruz v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cohen v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Saratoga v. HinzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.