Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1986No. 390A84PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Defendant brings forward two assignments of error on appeal. The first involves the cross-examination of the defendant concerning his post-arrest silence. In addition, defendant argues that double jeopardy principles prohibit his conviction and sentencing for both breaking or entering and felony larceny pursuant to that breaking or entering. For the reasons set forth below, we find no error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Defendant was convicted of breaking or entering a home in Gastonia, North Carolina, while the occupants were on vacation, and of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. State v. KemmerlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. MillsapsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. FernandezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API