Legal Opinion

State v. Price

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 149PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

In considering a trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of nonsuit, the evidence for the State, considered in the light most favorable to it, is deemed to be true and inconsistencies or contradictions therein are disregarded. State v. Vincent, 278 N.C. 63, 178 S.E. 2d 608; State v. Overman, 269 N.C. 453, 153 S.E. 2d 44. Evidence of the defendant which is favorable to the State is considered, but his evidence in conflict with that of the State is not considered upon such motion. State v. Greene, 278 N.C. 649, 180 S.E. 2d 789; State v. Vincent, supra. The question for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. VincentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API