Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 11A83PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

Through several assignments of error, the defendant contends the trial court committed error in a cautionary instruction to the jury and in allowing certain cross examination and argument by the State. The defendant also argues that his convictions for both armed robbery and felonious larceny violated his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy. We find no merit in these assignments of error.

The defendant’s convictions arose out of events which occurred on December 28, 1981 and which resulted in the death on the following day of Kauno Lehto, aged 70, owner of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API