Skovronski v. Genovese
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The only issue pursued concerns the conclusion of the trial court that the plaintiff was not guilty of any negligence which was a proximate cause of his injuries. The following are the facts found which are relevant thereto with such additions as the defendant is entitled to. Broad Street in New Britain runs east and west and Grove Street intersects it at approximately right angles. The plaintiff, at about 8:20 p. m. on November 22d, 1936, after walking northerly along the westerly side of Grove Street, was crossing Broad Street upon the westerly crosswalk and had reached a point thereon ten…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Porcello v. FinnanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Russell v. VergasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Catricola v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Moran v. GatzIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Connecticut Savings Bank v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Johnson v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Muse v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Steinhaus v. SteinhausSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.