Legal Opinion
Kinderavich v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 13, 1940PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries suffered when he was run over by a train of the railroad company represented by the defendant trustees. The finding states that he offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved that at the place of the accident the railroad is double tracked; that he was proceeding over the tracks at a crossing; that he had passed over the westbound track and was thereafter struck by a train of the defendants on the eastbound track; that he was thrown backward and landed between the rails on the westbound track at a point thirteen feet east of…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Nehring v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Isbell v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Monroe v. Hartford Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Zuchowicz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.