Legal Opinion
Neal v. Shiels, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 19, 1974PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff Brenda Neal, a minor, and her father, acting as next friend and for himself, brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered and expenses incurred and to be incurred, which were alleged to have been caused by the negligence of four defendants, Shiels, Inc., Samuel Chester, Edward Mansfield and Margherita Davidson. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, and the defendants Samuel Chester and Shiels, Inc., appealed. The defendants Mansfield and Davidson did not appeal. When in this opinion we refer to the defendants we refer only to Chester and Shiels, Inc.,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Moriarty v. LippeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Orlo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- State v. VarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.