Legal Opinion

Miranti v. Brookside Shopping Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 23, 1969PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

The plaintiff, a fifteen-year-old boy, who brought this action by his father, has appealed from the rendition of a summary judgment in favor of both defendants.

The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was seriously injured when he fell on a paved portion of property which was owned by the defendant the Brookside Shopping Center, Inc., and leased by the defendant the Western Auto Supply Company. Numerous acts of “carelessness, recklessness and negligence” were alleged relating, in one way or another, to the principal claim that each defendant was responsible for a dangerous accumulation of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Tetro v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Quinnett v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API