Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Pacific Bell Mobile Services
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 7, 2012No. A132619PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*208Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
Plaintiffs (Plaintiffs) alleged that the defendant wireless telephone companies (collectively, Defendants)1 made material misrepresentations to the consuming public as to the actual number of usable (i.e., conversational) airtime minutes in advertised subscriber rate plans.2 The trial court sustained Defendants’ demurrer to the class action allegations of the fifth amended complaint without leave to amend, relying in part on Knapp v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 932, 944 [124 Cal.Rptr.3d 565] (Knapp), involving similar allegations. We reverse as to…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bradley v. Networkers International, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sciarratta v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Gong v. City of RosemeadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Esparza v. Safeway, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.