Legal Opinion

Gong v. City of Rosemead

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 2014No. B247601PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MINK, J. *

Appellants Tammy Gong (Gong) and L&G Rosemead Garden LLC (L&G) (Gong and L&G are jointly referred to as “appellants”) seek to impose liability on the City of Rosemead (the City) for the alleged tortious conduct of John Tran (Tran), a former member of its city council and former mayor of the City. Appellants allege that while L&G’s proposed real estate project was proceeding through the City’s approval process, Tran, the City’s mayor, “extracted” $38,000 in “loans” from Gong, refused to repay her, and then set about a retaliatory course of conduct to prevent the approval of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Wormuth v. Lammersville Union Sch. Dist.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Esparza v. Kaweah Delta District HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API