Legal Opinion

In re Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 10, 1939No. 4575PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, District Judge.

Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District, herein referred to as “the District,” an insolvent taxing agency in the State of California, filed in this court on September 21, 1937, its petition for confirmation of a plan of composition and readjustment of its outstanding bond indebtedness. The proceeding is based upon Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Act, 52 Stat. 939, § 81 et seq., 11 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq. The constitution *990ality of the Congressional legislation which is invoked by the District in this proceeding is established beyond any doubt. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BekinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. In Re Merced Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
  4. Slupsky v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  5. In re Drainage Dist. No. 7District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bekins v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. City of SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. In re Corcoran Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1939
  4. Ouerbacker v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. In re Summer Lake Irr. Dist.District Court, D. Oregon · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API